Diplomatic Efforts in the Middle East
The United States, led by Secretary of State Antony Blinken, has initiated diplomatic discussions with various Arab nations. The goal is to garner support and cooperation in establishing a new governing body in Gaza, following the potential downfall of Hamas’s control over the region.
Also read: The Global Assault on Jews (Antisemitism is Spiking)
Possible Solutions on the Table
Among the potential solutions being considered is the formation of a multinational force. This force would be comprised of representatives from countries within the region, all working together to create a stable and effective governing body in Gaza. This approach aims to bring together the strengths and resources of multiple nations to address the complex challenges facing Gaza in the post-war period.
Watch:
>> RAW VIDEO FOOTAGE (Extremely Graphic)
Hamas Massacres, Southern Israel, 7th October 2023 <<
credit: HamasVideo.com
Potential Key Players in the New Governance Structure
The Wall Street Journal report highlights the potential roles that Turkey, Egypt, Qatar, and Jordan might play in the governance of the Gaza Strip after the conflict. Each of these nations could provide crucial support and play a central role in establishing and maintaining a new governing body in the region. Their involvement would be instrumental in creating a sustainable and peaceful future for the people of Gaza.
Also read: What is Islamist Jihadi Terrorism?
History of Governance in Gaza
The governance of Gaza has been a complex and contested issue, with a history that spans several decades and involves various geopolitical factors.
Prior to the 1948 Arab-Israeli war, Gaza was part of the British Mandate for Palestine. After the war, Egypt administered Gaza until the 1967 Six-Day War, when Israel captured the territory. The Oslo Accords, signed in 1993, laid the groundwork for Palestinian self-governance in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. In 2005, Israel unilaterally disengaged from Gaza, evacuating its settlers and military presence.
The governance of Gaza took a significant turn in 2006, when the Islamist terrorist group Hamas won the Palestinian legislative elections. The subsequent year saw Hamas violently seizing control of Gaza from the rival Fatah party, leading to a division between the West Bank, governed by the Palestinian Authority (PA), and Gaza, under Hamas rule.
Hamas’ control of Gaza has been marked by tensions with Israel, resulting in several conflicts. The group’s governance has also been criticized for its human rights abuses and restrictions on civil liberties.
The history of governance in Gaza reflects the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the internal Palestinian political divide. The territory’s future governance remains uncertain, with ongoing efforts by various stakeholders to find a solution that ensures stability, peace, and self-determination for the Palestinian people.
October 7th 2023 – What Started This War
The Hamas offensive commenced with a massive launch of over 5,000 rockets from the Gaza Strip targeting Israel, accompanied by approximately 3,000 Palestinian militants crossing the Gaza-Israel barrier. These militants executed civilian massacres, torched homes, and assaulted Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) bases near the Gaza Strip. The international community, with at least 44 nations primarily from the West, condemned the incursion as an act of terrorism. Hamas justified its actions as a response to various provocations, including the “desecration of the Al-Aqsa Mosque,” the blockade of the Gaza Strip, Israeli settlements, and settler violence.
The ongoing conflict represents the most intense fighting since the Yom Kippur War and is the fifth war in the Gaza Strip, forming part of the longstanding Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In the months leading up to the October offensive, escalating violence between Israelis and Palestinians resulted in the deaths of at least 247 Palestinians, 32 Israelis, and two foreign nationals.
Why Hamas Should be Replaced
- Human Rights Violations: Hamas has been accused of committing various human rights violations, including the use of civilians as human shields, the recruitment of child soldiers, and the suppression of political opposition and free speech within Gaza.
- Terrorist Activities: Hamas is classified as a terrorist organization by numerous countries and international entities, including the United States, European Union, and Canada. Its involvement in attacks against civilian populations and the use of suicide bombings have been widely condemned.
- Lack of Progress on Peace Process: Critics argue that Hamas has not demonstrated a genuine commitment to the peace process with Israel, and its refusal to recognize Israel’s right to exist has been a major obstacle to finding a lasting solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
- Poor Governance: Since taking control of Gaza in 2007, Hamas has been criticized for its poor governance and inability to provide basic services and improve the living conditions of the people in Gaza.
- Contribution to Regional Instability: Hamas’ activities and its alignment with other regional actors, such as Iran, have been seen as contributing to instability in the Middle East and undermining efforts to achieve regional peace and security.
In conclusion
The conflict between Israeli forces and Hamas-led Palestinian militant groups has resulted in significant civilian casualties and widespread destruction. There are concerns about Hamas’ governance of Gaza, citing human rights violations, terrorist activities, lack of commitment to peace, and contribution to regional instability. These factors have led for an end to Hamas’ control of Gaza.
Anas-Mohammed / Shutterstock.com
